Volume 18 No 18 April 2002

Telemedicine

By R. A. Chan
Dropping off her two children at a neighborhood day-care center, Marybeth Hoyt worried the Emily, 2,
who was cranky and hadn’t eaten breakfast, might be coming down with an ear infection. Ordinarily, Hoyt
would skip work for a few hours to visit a family doctor. On this recent morning, with the help of computers, cameras and other telemedicine tools, she got Emily diagnosed by a University of Rochester
pediatrician in just 10 minutes.
“I saw the doctor on the (day-care center’s) computer, and he saw me, and we talked back and forth,” she said, still in awe over the extra layer of care offered since May at a Volunteer of America Children’s Center near downtown Rochester. A staff nurse at the center used a camera-linked stethoscope and an endoscope to examine the toddler’s lungs, ear and throat. The doctor, watching from afar, concluded, “there was a definite ear infection but that the chest sounded good,” said Hoyt, 27, a clerical worker. “I was very happy it was just done with, and we had the medicine within an hour,” she said. “It’s nice to be able to go to work and know my children are looked after by a credible doctor. You don’t even have to be there, and they’ll check them.”
Telemedicine has evolved over the last decade as a way to bring medical care to rural areas. Doctors can monitor patients via video screen as well as verbally directing medical procedures long-distance. Aided by school nurses, hospitals have telemedicine units set up at several schools. The project in Rochester, largely sponsored by a $330,000 federal grant, is one of the first in the country to offer “virtual house calls” at a day-care center, this one serving 250 children ages 6 months to 12 years from mostly low-income families with little or no health insurance.
“Clearly it’s where the need is greatest this is a logical place to start,” said Dr. Kenneth McConnochie, a pediatrician at the University of Rochester’s Strong Memorial Hospital and director of the telemedicine program. “Clinicians involved find they’re able to make observations that are as accurate as being there,” he said, noting that a child’s regular doctor is notified of each course of treatment.
Reducing the need for costly trips to the emergency ward or after-hours doctor visits, telemedicine might serve to improve children’s health and reduce health care costs, proponents say. “This is a glimpse into the future of medicine,” said McConnochie’s colleague, Dr. Neil Herendeen. “Using telemedicine, we do everything we normally would except touch the child. We rely on the nurses to be our hands. … The hope is that more children will receive the medical care they need because of the hassle-free option telemedicine provides.”
The two doctors have diagnosed mostly everyday illnesses such as colds, rashes, coughs, asthma, ringworm and pink eye in more than 125 children at the center and ordered in prescriptions from a pharmacy around the corner. “Even when illness requires exclusion from child care and the parent needs to pick up the child, the need for an office or emergency department visit is often avoided,” McConnochie said.
Movies Make Readers

When a book becomes a movie, a child’s relationship to the page does not have to suffer
My favorite scene in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone happens off-camera. It involves a supporting cast of concerned adults who decry the fact that a pretty good movie was made from a terrific book. Some-how the success of the Harry Potter movie is used as evidence that a bunch of muggles are ruining their children’s ability to imagine for themselves what happens inside a book or tainting their desire to ever pick one up. Soon enough, the thinking goes, our kids will be terminal couch potatoes, unable to conjure up anything more adventurous than an episode of Everybody Loves Raymond. This argument intensified as the holiday movies season kicked into full gear with the Dec. 19 U.S. release of The Fellowship of the Ring, the first film in a $300 million trilogy based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s classic fantasy cycle.
As someone who, when a child, was fed a steady diet of Mr. ED and believed that Charleton Heston really was Moses, I may not be in a position to pass judgment on the damage Hollywood can inflict on a young mind. But as the mother of a typical adolescent, I have to say that movies can lead a child to books, though sometimes and adult needs to illuminate the way.
Stanley Greenspan, author of Building Healthy Minds, says a child’s imagination develops in babyhood and is enhanced as kids grow, especially if adults pretend with them and challenge them to become “scriptwriters” in their own dramas, with lots of scenarios, subplots and intrigue. “In later childhood, books leave more room than movies for conjuring,” Greenspan says, “but movies can bring literature alive and stir the imagination.” Greenspan and others say the most important aspect of movie watching is the conversation after the final credits roll, when kids can be encouraged to think critically, be curious and go looking for answers in a book.Bonnie Kunzel, head of the Young Adult Library Services Association and an expert in fantasy literature, says, “In libraries, the most successful promotion we do is to ask people to ‘read a movie,’” meaning a book that kids have first experienced on the screen. The Harry Potter movie has led to a bump in reading of the already popular Harry Potter books, which has led young readers to C.S. Lewis (The Chronicles of Narnia) and Tolkien. “We can’t keep Lord of the Rings on the shelf,” Kunzel says. Tolkien purists who can’t bear to see images of Middle-earth put on the screen shoud take some comfort in the fact that the paperback version of the trilogy is flying off the shelves.

The first volume, The Fellowship of the Ring, is currently No.1on Publishers Weekly’s mass-market best-seller list, re-issued for a new generation of Tolkien readers and promoted with a still from the movie on its cover.