|
A
Free World & U.S. Appeasers
By Linda S. Heard
American President George W. Bush was indignant at being compared
to
Adolph Hitler by Germanys Justice Minister Herta Daeubler-Gmelin.
The German
publication Schwae-bisches Tagblatt reported the justice Minister
as saying, Bush wants
to divert attention from his domestic problems. Its a classic
tactic.
Its one that Hitler used.
|
White
house spokesman Ari Fleischer said that the president was very
angered by Daeubler-Gmelins comments, while Condoleezza
Rice, Bushs National Security Adviser, spoke of a poisoned atmosphere
between the U. S. and Germany.
U.S. senator Jesse Helm of North Carolina, and the ranking republican
on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that the U.S. should
consider moving its forces out of Germany has failed to join
a constructive dialogue on Iraq.
At the same time, another president was suffering not only insult
but also assault. President Yasser Arafat was once again under siege
in his Ramallah compound, surrounded by razor wire and Israeli tanks.
While IDF bulldozers demolished all Palestinian National Authority
buildings except the Palestinian president held office.
All of this was done on the pretext of searching for terrorists
whereas, in fact, it was an act of pure revenge on the part of the
Israelis for the suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. This desire to hurt
and humiliate even extended to the Palestinian National Authoritys
clerks and secretaries, who were forcibly evacuated prior to the buildings
being felled. They were treated as criminals; made to kneel while
blindfolded, and taken in to Israeli custodyto join the ranks of the
Palestinian disappeared.
According to the spokesman for the Palestinian President, Nabil Abu
Rudeineh, Arafat had been fired upon, the structure of his office
had been rendered unstable due to the destruction of the walkway and
he was in grave personal danger. Abu Rudeineh called for the immediate
intervention of the international community, and, in particular, the
U.S. He asserted that there were no terrorists hiding in the compound.
The
main difference between the two deeply offended Presidents is that
one is the strutting omnipotent leader of the super power, while the
other has been subjected to a U.S./Israel campaign of vilification
and character assassination until he has been sidelined and divested
of control over his own people.
In the case of George W. Bush, the person who made the offensive remarks,
Daeubler- Gmelin, was quick to say that she had
not linked the U.S. President with Hitler, and added that there was
no tape recording made of her remarks. This lucky omission gave Chancellor
Schroeder the opportunity to give his Minister of Justice the benefit
of the doubt, and he quickly wrote a letter to George W Bush apologizing
for any offence, which might have been taken.
Arafat, on the other hand, received no such apologies from the Israeli
leadership and no assistance from the rest of the world. The U.S.
did manage a feeble condemnation of the Israeli action, only proffered
because America doesnt want to be seen to be involved in regime-changes
right now, given its apparent determination to rid Iraq of Saddam
Hussain. The Palestinian President will not receive any such apology.
In this post-9/11 New World Order only the leaderships of Israel and
its mentor the U.S. receive groveling missives.
As Donald Rumsfeld said after Iraq agree to allow weapons inspector
back into its country unconditionally : the rules have changed
since 9/11. For the sake of accuracy, he should have said: America
was attacked and now there are no rules. Rules, diplomatic norms and
international law have become irrelevant in the face of American power
and ambition.If you dont like it, then tough.Do you remember
when Cherie Blair, wife of British Prime Minister, Tony Blair dared
to say
what she thought of the Palestinian suicide bombers? In the company
of Queen Rania of Jordan, Mrs. Blair spontaneously told reporters:
As long as young people feel they have got no hope but to blow
themselves up you are never going to make progress.
Naturally, Tony Blairs wife wasnt allowed to express her
own opinion, even though she is a prominent barrister and human rights
campaigner. After complaints from the Israeli Embassy in London and
pressure from the British government, Mrs. Blair apologised for expressing
her true sentiments.
Ted Turner, the founder of CNN, is yet another mover and shaker who
had to make a U-turn after the said: Arent the Israelis
and the Palestinians both terrorizing each other? The Palestinians
are fighting with human suicide bombers; thats all theyve
got one of the most powerful military machines in the world. The Palestinians
have nothing. So she are the terrorists?
CNN was quick to distance itself from Turners statement and
went as far as to send out hundreds of thousands of emails to subscribers
of their web-site saying that Turner had nothing whatsoever to do
with the editorial policy of CNN. These were followed up by Eason
Jordan, CNNS CEO, dashing over to Israel, amid threats of the
network being taken off-air, and pandering to the Israeli leadership.
CNN devoted a web site to Israeli victims only, while producing a
series on the families of such victims. Turner, who us the vice-chairman
of AOL Time-Warner, soon caved in, retracted his initial comments
and offered an apology. CNN lost credibility with both Israelis and
Arabs over the fiasco.
The worlds subservience to what is sometimes unflatteringly
called the United States of Israel is becoming glaringly obvious with
no attempt to hide blatant double standards. When Americans are killed,
there are memorials built, multiple minutes of silence, and send its
troops anywhere it likes to carry out any order it feels appropriate.
When Afghans are bombed in retaliation, there are no apologies, only
justification and excuses from the U.S. administration.
When Israelis are killed, the scenes of carnage are shown for hours
on American and British network. The U.S. President extends his condolences
to the families and Palestinian terror is condemned. However
Palestinian can be killed, maimed and jailed with impunity; their
homes bulldozed, their orchards leveled and their livelihoods jeopardized
by curfews and checkpoints.
While
Iraq is condemned for ignoring some 16 UN resolutions, the U.S. and
the UN stay silent about Israels rejection of over 60 such resolutions
as well as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharons unilateral dismantling
of the Oslo Accords. Dennis Ross went so far as to call the resolution
against Israel advisory while those against Iraq mandatory.
Ross, who is often wheeled out on talk shows as a neutral Middle-East
expert, is, in fact, allied to AIPAC, the most influential pro-Israel
lobby in the U.S. and is obviously not averse to bending the truth.There
is no proof that Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction and every
certainty that Israel does, and yet Iraq not allowed to possess such
weapons, while international atomic energy inspectors are denied access
to Israels nuclear complex at Dimona. The excuse given is that
Israel is the regions only democracy.
As the British writer and activist Tariq Ali said on CNN, the only
country thus far to have actually used nuclear weapons has been a
democratic one, alluding, of course, to Americas bombing of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Today, America calls itself the leader of the free world
but is there a free world any more? In recent weeks we have seen the
resolve of nations morally opposed to any invasion of Iraq, collapse
like card houses.
A voice of sanity amid the intimidation, bribes and under- the table
deals is that of the ex-South African premier Nelson Mandela. He calls
a spade a spade and believes that the true threat to world peace is
the Bush administration, as he told Newsweek, his intent on waging
this war so as to appease the U.S. weapons industry.
The day that the white House receives an apology or a retraction from
this remarkable, honest human being will signal the end of principles,
ethics, free speech and international law and there-emergence of the
laws of the jungle. This World needs more Nelson Mandelas and
less cowardly appeasers and apologists if it has any hope of survival,
as we know it.
|
The
Rap on Pap
Women whose Pap smears arent quite normal, but not abnormal
either, are usually advised to do one of two things: get a
follow-up Pap in six months or undergo an expensive procedure
called a colposcopy, in which the cervix is closely examined
and usually biopsied. Now researchers report on a third alternative.
In a major study, they found that testing for the human papilloma
virus in women with equivocal Paps quickly and accurately
indtifies which women are most likely to have precancerous
or cancerous lesions upon biopsy, sparing half of them the
need to undergo one.
|
|
Aids
Update
Young gay men in America have long been at high risk for AIDS,
but the results of a new survey stunned health officials.
Fully 30% of gay black men from the ages of 23 to 29 are now
infected with HIV, and nearly half of all gay men in their
20s report that they engage in unprotected anal sex. Either
the safe-sex messages arent getting through or new AIDS
treatments have made young men tragically complacent.
|
|
|
|
|