Volume 27 No27 February&March 2003
 
Open Forum
In Issues And Views ...........A Free World & U.S. Appeasers | Horrors Of war | Piracy:A Threat To nation
 
Print This Article Send This Article To Your Friend

A Free World & U.S. Appeasers
By Linda S. Heard
American President George W. Bush was indignant at being compared to
Adolph Hitler by Germany’s Justice Minister Herta Daeubler-Gmelin. The German
publication Schwae-bisches Tagblatt reported the justice Minister as saying, “Bush wants
to divert attention from his domestic problems. It’s a classic tactic.
It’s one that Hitler used”.
White house spokesman Ari Fleischer said that the president was “very angered” by Daeubler-Gmelin’s comments, while Condoleezza Rice, Bush’s National Security Adviser, spoke of a poisoned atmosphere between the U. S. and Germany.
U.S. senator Jesse Helm of North Carolina, and the ranking republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that the U.S. should consider moving its forces out of Germany has failed to “join a constructive dialogue on Iraq”.
At the same time, another president was suffering not only insult but also assault. President Yasser Arafat was once again under siege in his Ramallah compound, surrounded by razor wire and Israeli tanks. While IDF bulldozers demolished all Palestinian National Authority buildings except the Palestinian president held office.
All of this was done on the pretext of searching for “terrorists” whereas, in fact, it was an act of pure revenge on the part of the Israelis for the suicide bombing in Tel Aviv. This desire to hurt and humiliate even extended to the Palestinian National Authority’s clerks and secretaries, who were forcibly evacuated prior to the buildings being felled. They were treated as criminals; made to kneel while blindfolded, and taken in to Israeli custodyto join the ranks of the Palestinian disappeared.
According to the spokesman for the Palestinian President, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, Arafat had been fired upon, the structure of his office had been rendered unstable due to the destruction of the walkway and he was in grave personal danger. Abu Rudeineh called for the immediate intervention of the international community, and, in particular, the U.S. He asserted that there were no terrorists hiding in the compound.
The main difference between the two deeply offended Presidents is that one is the strutting omnipotent leader of the super power, while the other has been subjected to a U.S./Israel campaign of vilification and character assassination until he has been sidelined and divested of control over his own people.
In the case of George W. Bush, the person who made the offensive remarks, Daeubler- Gmelin, was quick to say that she had not linked the U.S. President with Hitler, and added that there was no tape recording made of her remarks. This lucky omission gave Chancellor Schroeder the opportunity to give his Minister of Justice the benefit of the doubt, and he quickly wrote a letter to George W Bush apologizing for any offence, which might have been taken.
Arafat, on the other hand, received no such apologies from the Israeli leadership and no assistance from the rest of the world. The U.S. did manage a feeble condemnation of the Israeli action, only proffered because America doesn’t want to be seen to be involved in regime-changes right now, given its apparent determination to rid Iraq of Saddam Hussain. The Palestinian President will not receive any such apology. In this post-9/11 New World Order only the leaderships of Israel and its mentor the U.S. receive groveling missives.
As Donald Rumsfeld said after Iraq agree to allow weapons inspector back into its country unconditionally : “the rules have changed since 9/11”. For the sake of accuracy, he should have said: America was attacked and now there are no rules. Rules, diplomatic norms and international law have become irrelevant in the face of American power and ambition.If you don’t like it, then tough.Do you remember when Cherie Blair, wife of British Prime Minister, Tony Blair dared to say what she thought of the Palestinian suicide bombers? In the company of Queen Rania of Jordan, Mrs. Blair spontaneously told reporters: “As long as young people feel they have got no hope but to blow themselves up you are never going to make progress.”
Naturally, Tony Blair’s wife wasn’t allowed to express her own opinion, even though she is a prominent barrister and human rights campaigner. After complaints from the Israeli Embassy in London and pressure from the British government, Mrs. Blair apologised for expressing her true sentiments.
Ted Turner, the founder of CNN, is yet another mover and shaker who had to make a U-turn after the said: “Aren’t the Israelis and the Palestinians both terrorizing each other? The Palestinians are fighting with human suicide bombers; that’s all they’ve got one of the most powerful military machines in the world. The Palestinians have nothing. So she are the terrorists?”
CNN was quick to distance itself from Turner’s statement and went as far as to send out hundreds of thousands of emails to subscribers of their web-site saying that Turner had nothing whatsoever to do with the editorial policy of CNN. These were followed up by Eason Jordan, CNN’S CEO, dashing over to Israel, amid threats of the network being taken off-air, and pandering to the Israeli leadership. CNN devoted a web site to Israeli victims only, while producing a series on the families of such victims. Turner, who us the vice-chairman of AOL Time-Warner, soon caved in, retracted his initial comments and offered an apology. CNN lost credibility with both Israelis and Arabs over the fiasco.
The world’s subservience to what is sometimes unflatteringly called the United States of Israel is becoming glaringly obvious with no attempt to hide blatant double standards. When Americans are killed, there are memorials built, multiple minutes of silence, and send its troops anywhere it likes to carry out any order it feels appropriate.
When Afghans are bombed in retaliation, there are no apologies, only justification and excuses from the U.S. administration.
When Israelis are killed, the scenes of carnage are shown for hours on American and British network. The U.S. President extends his condolences to the families and Palestinian “terror” is condemned. However Palestinian can be killed, maimed and jailed with impunity; their homes bulldozed, their orchards leveled and their livelihoods jeopardized by curfews and checkpoints.
While Iraq is condemned for ignoring some 16 UN resolutions, the U.S. and the UN stay silent about Israel’s rejection of over 60 such resolutions as well as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s unilateral dismantling of the Oslo Accords. Dennis Ross went so far as to call the resolution against Israel “advisory” while those against Iraq “mandatory.” Ross, who is often wheeled out on talk shows as a neutral Middle-East expert, is, in fact, allied to AIPAC, the most influential pro-Israel lobby in the U.S. and is obviously not averse to bending the truth.There is no proof that Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction and every certainty that Israel does, and yet Iraq not allowed to possess such weapons, while international atomic energy inspectors are denied access to Israel’s nuclear complex at Dimona. The excuse given is that Israel is the region’s only democracy.
As the British writer and activist Tariq Ali said on CNN, the only country thus far to have actually used nuclear weapons has been a democratic one, alluding, of course, to America’s bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Today, America calls itself “the leader of the free world” but is there a free world any more? In recent weeks we have seen the resolve of nations morally opposed to any invasion of Iraq, collapse like card houses.
A voice of sanity amid the intimidation, bribes and under- the –table deals is that of the ex-South African premier Nelson Mandela. He calls a spade a spade and believes that the true threat to world peace is the Bush administration, as he told Newsweek, his intent on waging this war so as to appease the U.S. weapons industry.
The day that the white House receives an apology or a retraction from this remarkable, honest human being will signal the end of principles, ethics, free speech and international law and there-emergence of the laws of the jungle. This World needs more Nelson Mandela’s and less cowardly appeasers and apologists if it has any hope of survival, as we know it.
The Rap on Pap
Women whose Pap smears aren’t quite normal, but not abnormal either, are usually advised to do one of two things: get a follow-up Pap in six months or undergo an expensive procedure called a colposcopy, in which the cervix is closely examined and usually biopsied. Now researchers report on a third alternative. In a major study, they found that testing for the human papilloma virus in women with equivocal Paps quickly and accurately indtifies which women are most likely to have precancerous or cancerous lesions upon biopsy, sparing half of them the need to undergo one.

Aids Update
Young gay men in America have long been at high risk for AIDS, but the results of a new survey stunned health officials. Fully 30% of gay black men from the ages of 23 to 29 are now infected with HIV, and nearly half of all gay men in their 20s report that they engage in unprotected anal sex. Either the safe-sex messages aren’t getting through or new AIDS treatments have made young men tragically complacent.

Reproduction of material from any Reflections Monthly Magazine without written permission is strictly prohibited......Copyright © 2001,03 Vreflect.com. All rights reserved.

Site Designed And Maintained By