Exploring
Earth’s Belly is ambitious in a scientific sense and could yield
valuable data. The solid inner core rotates faster than the outer
core, which is fluid and is responsible for Earth’s magnetic field.
But scientists don’t know exactly why all this is so, nor do they
know the exact composition or temperature of the core. If further
research showed the core mission could actually work, it would be
comparable in dollar terms with many space projects, says David Stevenson,
a Caltech planetary scientist who has worked on several missions for
NASA. Stevenson explains his idea in an article titled “A Modest Proposal”
in Thursday’s issue of the journal Nature.
Splitting Earth Stevenson figures that a nuclear device would
likely be the best way to blast the necessary gap, as long and deep
as several football fields and about 1 foot wide (30 centimeters).
The event would be commensurate with an earthquake measuring 7 on
the Richter Scale. At least 100,000 tons of hot iron would be poured
instantly into the crack, along with a well-protected probe the size
of a grapefruit. “Once you set that condition up, the crack is self-perpetuating,”
Stevenson explains. The weight of the iron, which is much denser than
Earth’s outer regions, would open a gap all the way to the outer portion
planet’s core, about 1,860 miles (3,000 kilometers) below. The probe
would fall at about 10 mph (16 kilometers per hour) as the crack closes
up behind it. The weeks-long mission would seek to measure the temperature,
electrical conductivity and chemical composition of the core. Stevenson
said the amount of iron needed is equal to what’s produced on Earth
in a week or less. “We’ve spent more than $10 billion in unmanned
missions to the planets,” Stevenson said. “But we’ve only been down
about 10 kilometers [6.2 miles] into our own planet.” Most of the
universe is above us and empty, Stevenson notes, yet “the part below
is crammed with interesting stuff and is also mostly unknown.”
Dynamics of Earth's Core Reveal Hurricanes Under Your Feet
A spacecraft sends its observations back via radio. But radio signals
don’t propagate through the planet, so the Earth probe would relay
data to the surface by deforming itself to create low-intensity waves
akin to sending sound from a loudspeaker. Think of the probe throbbing
like a heart,” Stevenson said. “It will set the neighboring material
in motion and that causes a sound wave to travel away from the probe
all the way to Earth’s surface.” The idea is a bit reminiscent of
a recently released movie, “The Core,” in which “terranauts” travel
into the planet to jumpstart the core, which has stopped rotating
and begun to cause all manner of peril at the surface. Stevenson said
he first conceived a core mission years ago, and that the scientific
connection between the fiction and his fact-based proposal is negligible.
"But the movie prompted me to write my ideas down," he said. The scientist,
who researches the origin and evolution of Earth and the other planets,
acknowledges that at this early stage of thinking about the concept,
it should be considered to have a low probability of success. "The
same is true of space missions several years before they happened,
or of the Manhattan Project in 1940," he said. "Obviously you don't
pursue it if after a lot of study it is seen to be low probability
or impossible. But we're not at that stage!" Core concerns Is David
Stevenson's idea more than a mere science-fiction plot? Other earth
scientists say the plan is impractical, but intriguing. University
of Connecticut geophysicist Vernon Cormier said intense heat and pressure
makes it impossible to drill down to the core. Stevenson's proposal
"allows the hole to keep open because it is not really an open hole
or an open crack -- it is a crack filled by a fluid that is denser
than its surroundings." That density difference would allow the crack
to continue to sink while sealing above itself, Cormier said. However,
international treaties would put significant limits on underground
nuclear explosions, he said. A more achievable goal would be adding
deep-sea seismic stations to fill in holes in the current global network,
Cormier said. "If we had the same kind of coverage of the ocean ...
we could learn quite a bit. It would still be very expensive, but
a fraction of the cost." |